4.3 Article

The Impact of Green R&D Activities on SO2 Emissions: Evidence from China

Journal

MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6680560

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous research has shown the importance of domestic research and development (R&D) activities in improving environmental performance, with a focus on the impact of green R&D activities on SO2 emissions. The study found that green R&D activities have a critical influence on reducing SO2 emissions, with utility-type R&D activities showing the most significant positive impact on emission reduction. Further research suggests that the impact of green R&D activities on SO2 emissions is nonlinear, depending on the technology's absorptive ability.
Prior research on the effectiveness of improving environmental performance has acknowledged the importance of domestic research and development (R&D) activities. However, these studies remain general and ambiguous because they assume that all R&D operations are associated with environmental performance. The corresponding empirical evidence is inexact and ambiguous. In this study, we focus on the effect of green R&D activities on SO2 emission. Considering that heterogeneity exists in green R&D activities, we divide them into two groups for two purposes. The empirical results, explored based on China's interprovincial data between 2000 and 2016, suggest that green R&D activities critically influence the reduction of SO2 emissions. However, the R&D activities of different purposes show statistically differentiated effects on SO2 emissions. Primarily, utility-type R&D activities show the most significant positive impact on SO2 emissions reduction. Subsequent research based on the panel threshold also indicates that the impact of green R&D activities on SO2 emissions shows nonlinear characteristics, depending on the technology's absorptive ability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available