4.4 Article

GANSim: Conditional Facies Simulation Using an Improved Progressive Growing of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)

Journal

MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES
Volume 53, Issue 7, Pages 1413-1444

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-021-09934-0

Keywords

Conditional facies modeling; Generative adversarial networks (GANs); Progressive growing of GANs; Deep learning; Geological pattern; Reservoir forecast

Funding

  1. Stanford Center for Earth Resources Forecasting (SCERF)
  2. Stanford School of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences
  3. Stanford University
  4. Stanford Research Computing Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conditional facies modeling combines geological spatial patterns with different types of observed data to build earth models for predictions of subsurface resources. Researchers have improved GANs for conditional facies simulation by introducing an extra condition-based loss function and adjusting the architecture of the generator, resulting in high-quality facies models and stronger conditioning ability of the generators.
Conditional facies modeling combines geological spatial patterns with different types of observed data, to build earth models for predictions of subsurface resources. Recently, researchers have used generative adversarial networks (GANs) for conditional facies modeling, where an unconditional GAN is first trained to learn the geological patterns using the original GAN's loss function, then appropriate latent vectors are searched to generate facies models that are consistent with the observed conditioning data. A problem with this approach is that the time-consuming search process needs to be conducted for every new conditioning data. As an alternative, we improve GANs for conditional facies simulation (called GANSim) by introducing an extra condition-based loss function and adjusting the architecture of the generator to take the conditioning data as inputs, based on progressive growing of GANs. The condition-based loss function is defined as the inconsistency between the input conditioning value and the corresponding characteristics exhibited by the output facies model, and forces the generator to learn the ability of being consistent with the input conditioning data, together with the learning of geological patterns. Our input conditioning factors include global features (e.g., the mud facies proportion) alone, local features such as sparse well facies data alone, and joint combination of global features and well facies data. After training, we evaluate both the quality of generated facies models and the conditioning ability of the generators, by manual inspection and quantitative assessment. The trained generators are quite robust in generating high-quality facies models conditioned to various types of input conditioning information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available