4.8 Review

Arterial hypertension

Journal

LANCET
Volume 398, Issue 10296, Pages 249-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00221-X

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Fund for the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan [20-4-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arterial hypertension is a major contributor to the global burden of disease, but disease control remains poor. Diagnosis and treatment of hypertension should be based on a combination of various guidelines, with equal emphasis on pharmacological treatment and lifestyle adjustments. Device-based therapies such as renal denervation are rapidly evolving to expand therapeutic options.
Arterial hypertension is the most important contributor to the global burden of disease; however, disease control remains poor. Although the diagnosis of hypertension is still based on office blood pressure, confirmation with out-of-office blood pressure measurements (ie, ambulatory or home monitoring) is strongly recommended. The definition of hypertension differs throughout various guidelines, but the indications for antihypertensive therapy are relatively similar. Lifestyle adaptation is absolutely key in non-pharmacological treatment. Pharmacologically, angiotens-inconverting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics are the first-line agents, with advice for the use of single-pill combination therapy by most guidelines. As a fourth-line agent, spironolactone should be considered. The rapidly evolving field of device-based therapy, especially renal denervation, will further broaden therapeutic options. Despite being a largely controllable condition, the actual rates of awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension are disappointingly low. Further improvements throughout the process of patient screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up need to be urgently addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available