4.5 Article

Miniaturization of Bubbles by Shock Waves in Gas-Liquid Two-phase Flow in the Venturi Tube

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 1068-1076

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11630-021-1432-5

Keywords

fine bubble; shock wave; gas-liquid two-phase flow; venturi tube

Funding

  1. Mishima Laboratory in Fukuoka University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fine bubbles are widely used in various fields, and research on their generation is important to increase yield and lower costs. While the converging-diverging nozzle generator is simple and cheap, factors affecting bubble size and amount are not well understood.
Fine bubbles have been widely applied in many fields such as industry, medical engineering and agricultures. Therefore, many attentions have been paid to the study of fine bubble generations in order to increase the yield while decrease the cost. However, the generation process of fine bubbles is a quite complicated process in which multiple hydrodynamic forces are interacted in the gas-liquid two-phase flow. Many studies focus on the techniques of the converging-diverging nozzle (venturi tube) generator, which is famous for its simple and cheap features, and generates fine bubbles by using the miniaturization phenomenon of bubbles occurring in the venturi tube. However, the impact conditions on the amount and size of bubbles such as nozzle geometry and bleed air haven't been investigated clearly. In this work, we implement many experiments on the venturi tube fine bubble generators with different geometries and generating conditions, and evaluate different factors impacting the production components such as the volume and the bubble size. The experimental results show that the supersonic flow filed in the venturi tube promotes the miniaturization of the bubbles, and the convergent angle of the nozzle and air bleed have a great impact on the size and volume of bubbles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available