4.8 Article

A New Class of Molecular Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution: Catalytic Activity of M3N@C2n (2n=68, 78, and 80) Fullerenes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 143, Issue 16, Pages 6037-6042

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c13002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [CHE-1801317]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [AH-0033]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science [CTQ2017-87269-P]
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017SGR629]
  5. URV
  6. ICREA foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrocatalytic properties of some endohedral fullerenes for hydrogen evolution reactions have been predicted, with a non-IPR Sc3N@D3(6140)-C68 compound showing the best catalytic performance with high activity and stability. The fused pentagon rings in the structure are believed to be the key to its superior performance, making it a promising catalytic motif for HER.
The electrocatalytic properties of some endohedral fullerenes for hydrogen evolution reactions (HER) were recently predicted by DFT calculations. Nonetheless, the experimental catalytic performance under realistic electrochemical environments of these 0D-nanomaterials have not been explored. Here, for the first time, we disclose the HER electrocatalytic behavior of seven M3N@2n (2n = 68, 78, and 80) fullerenes (Gd3N@Ih(7)-C-80, Y3N@I-h(7)-C-80, Lu3N@I-h(7)-C-80, Sc-3 N@Ih(7)-C-80, Sc3N@D-5h(6)-C-80, Sc3N@D-3h(5)-C78, and Sc3N@D-3(6140)-C-68) using a combination of experimental and theoretical techniques. The non-IPR Sc3N@D3(6140)-C68 compound exhibited the best catalytic performance toward the generation of molecular hydrogen, exhibiting an onset potential of -38 mV vs RHE, a very high mass activity of 1.75 A.mg(-1) at -0.4 V vs RHE, and an excellent electrochemical stability, retaining 96% of the initial current after 24 h. The superior performance was explained on the basis of the fused pentagon rings, which represent a new and promising HER catalytic motif.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available