4.5 Article

Polymeric metal-containing ionic liquid sorbent coating for the determination of amines using headspace solid-phase microextraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 44, Issue 13, Pages 2620-2630

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202100119

Keywords

amines; nickel; polymeric ionic liquids; solid‐ phase microextraction

Funding

  1. Chemical Measurement and Imaging Program at the National Science Foundation [CHE-1709372, POWR.03.02.00-IP.08-00-DOK/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presented a novel polymeric ionic liquid sorbent coating for the determination of volatile and semivolatile amines from water samples, demonstrating high enrichment factors and excellent analytical performance. The developed method showed good application results in tap water and lake water samples.
This study describes the design, synthesis, and application of polymeric ionic liquid sorbent coatings featuring nickel metal centers for the determination of volatile and semivolatile amines from water samples using headspace solid-phase microextraction. The examined polymeric ionic liquid (PIL) sorbent coatings were composed of two ionic liquid monomers (tetra(3-vinylimidazolium)nickel bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide [Ni2+(VIM)(4)] 2[NTf2-] and 1-vinyl-3-hexylimidazolium [HVIM+][NTf2-]), and an ionic liquid cross-linker (1,12-di(3-vinylimidazolium)dodecane [(VIM)(2)C-12(2+)] 2[NTf2-]). With these ionic liquid monomers and cross-linkers, three different types of coatings were prepared: PIL 1 based on the neat [Ni2+(VIM)(4)] 2[NTf2-] monomer, PIL 2 consisting of the [Ni2+(VIM)(4)] 2[NTf2-] monomer with addition of cross-linker, and PIL 3 composed of the [HVIM+][NTf2-] monomer and cross-linker. Analytical performance of the prepared sorbent coatings using headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was compared with the polydimethylsiloxane and polyacrylate commercial coatings. The PIL 2 sorbent coating yielded the highest enrichment factors ranging from 5500 to over 160 000 for the target analytes. The developed headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method was applied for the analysis of real samples (the concentration of amines was 200 mu g/L), producing relative recovery values in the range of 90.9-120.0% (PIL 1) and 83.0-122.7% (PIL 2) from tap water, and 84.8-112.4% (PIL 1) and 79.2-119.3% (PIL 2) from lake water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available