Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-04-06
DOI
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.013
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- In vitro comparison of trueness of 10 intraoral scanners for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses
- (2020) Caglar Bilmenoglu et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- An in vitro 3D evaluation of the accuracy of 4 intraoral optical scanners on a 6-implant model
- (2020) Toni Sami et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- In vitro comparison of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners and three conventional impression methods for two neighboring implants
- (2020) Elena Roig et al. PLoS One
- Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: An in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete‐arch implant rehabilitation
- (2020) Ruoxuan Huang et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study
- (2020) Francesco Guido Mangano et al. BMC Oral Health
- Trueness of Intraoral Scanners Considering Operator Experience and Three Different Implant Scenarios: A Preliminary Report
- (2020) Luigi Canullo et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS
- Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses
- (2019) Ryan M. Mizumoto et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model
- (2019) Chris Bocklet et al. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
- Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners
- (2019) Adolfo Di Fiore et al. Journal of Prosthodontic Research
- The effect of scanning the palate and scan body position on the accuracy of complete‐arch implant scans
- (2019) Ryan M. Mizumoto et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study
- (2019) Francesco Guido Mangano et al. BMC Oral Health
- The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners
- (2019) Ethan Dutton et al. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
- Intraoral digital scans—Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners
- (2019) Marta Revilla-León et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Intraoral digital scans: Part 2—influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners
- (2019) Marta Revilla-León et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner
- (2019) Marta Revilla‐León et al. Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
- Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study
- (2019) Constantin Motel et al. Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
- The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2018) Tabea Flügge et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device
- (2018) Mikel Iturrate et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative in Vitro Study
- (2016) Francesco G. Mangano et al. PLoS One
- Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Parallel Confocal Laser Technology for Implants with Consideration of Operator Experience and Implant Angulation and Depth
- (2014) Beatriz Giménez et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
- Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology for Implants Considering Operator Experience, Implant Angulation, and Depth
- (2013) Beatriz Giménez et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering
- (2013) Joannis Katsoulis et al. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
- Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study
- (2013) Frank S. Andriessen et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- In Vitro Measurements of Precision of Fit of Implant-Supported Frameworks. A Comparison between “Virtual” and “Physical” Assessments of Fit Using Two Different Techniques of Measurements
- (2011) Torsten Jemt et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
- Precision of Fit to Implants: A Comparison of Cresco™ and Procera® Implant Bridge Frameworks
- (2009) Lars Hjalmarsson et al. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started