4.8 Article

Toward Rational Design of Single-Atom Catalysts

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 2837-2847

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00049

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [N000141812155]
  2. Office of Naval Research award [N000141812155]
  3. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [N000141812155] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Downscaling catalyst size has been used to improve the atomic utilization efficiency of catalysts, with single-atom catalysts (SACs) representing the pinnacle of this process. However, the development of SACs still relies heavily on trial-and-error experiments due to a lack of comprehensive understanding of their unique properties and structure-activity relationships. Major challenges for future research on SACs include precisely controlled synthesis, advanced operando characterizations, and the discovery of unconventional catalytic mechanisms.
Downscaling catalyst size has long been used to promote the atomic utilization efficiency of catalysts. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) are the current end of this downscaling road, offering the potential of 100% metal atom utilization and excellent catalytic behavior compared with traditional nanoparticle catalysts. However, most development of SACs still relies on trial-and-error experiments because of the insufficient understanding of the distinctive properties of SACs and their structure-activity relationships. This Perspective discusses the path forward toward the rational design of SACs through a summary of understanding regarding the distinctive properties of single-atom active sites, their dynamic changes during the reactions, and the corresponding reaction mechanisms. Major challenges and opportunities for future research on SACs are identified in precisely controlled synthesis, advanced operando characterizations, and discovering the unconventional catalytic mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available