4.3 Article

Ivermectin in combination with doxycycline for treating COVID-19 symptoms: a randomized trial

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03000605211013550

Keywords

Ivermectin; doxycycline; COVID-19; recovery time; infection; reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection treated with ivermectin plus doxycycline recovered more quickly, had a reduced risk of disease progression, and were more likely to test negative by RT-PCR on day 14.
Objective We evaluated whether ivermectin combined with doxycycline reduced the clinical recovery time in adults with COVID-19 infection. Methods This was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms randomly assigned to treatment (n = 200) and placebo (n = 200) groups. The primary outcome was duration from treatment to clinical recovery. Secondary outcomes were disease progression and persistent COVID-19 positivity by RT-PCR. Results Among 556 screened patients, 400 were enrolled and 363 completed follow-up. The mean patient age was 40 years, and 59% were men. The median recovery time was 7 (4-10, treatment group) and 9 (5-12, placebo group) days (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.90). The number of patients with a <= 7-day recovery was 61% (treatment group) and 44% (placebo groups) (hazard ratio, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.09). The proportion of patients who remained RT-PCR positive on day 14 and whose disease did not progress was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the placebo group. Conclusions Patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection treated with ivermectin plus doxycycline recovered earlier, were less likely to progress to more serious disease, and were more likely to be COVID-19 negative by RT-PCR on day 14. Data Repository ID Dryad. doi:10.5061/dryad.qjq2bvqf6

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available