4.7 Article

White-rot fungi-mediated biodegradation of cytostatic drugs - bleomycin and vincristine

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 407, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124632

Keywords

Anticancer drugs; Degradation; Enzymes; Toxicology; White-rot fungi (WRF)

Funding

  1. Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology [08/080/BKM20/0079, BKM-594/RIE7/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the removal efficacy of five white-rot fungi on anticancer drugs, showing that some fungi can efficiently remove the drugs in a short period, which is associated with the production of laccase.
The contamination of the environment with anticancer drugs, which show recalcitrance to conventional wastewater treatment, has become a significant ecological threat. Fungi represent a promising non-conventional biological alternative for water conditioning. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of five white-rot fungi (Fomes fomentarius (CB13), Hypholoma fasciculare (CB15), Phyllotopsis nidulans (CB14), Pleurotus ostreatus (BWPH) and Trametes versicolor (CB8)) in the removal of bleomycin and vincristine. The removal capacity was measured at 0, 4, 9, and 14 days of incubation using SPE-UPLC-MS. The enzymatic profiles of laccase, manganese, and lignin peroxidases and wide range of ecoand cytotoxicity, assays of the post-process samples were also conducted. We observed >94% vincristine elimination by F. fomentarius, H. fasciculare and T. versicolor after only 4 days. Bleomycin removal occurred after a minimum of 9 days and only when the drug was incubated with T. versicolor (36%) and H. fasciculare (25%). The removal of both cytostatics was associated with laccase production, and the loss of ecoand cytotoxicity, especially in regard to viability of Lemna minor and Daphnia magna, as well as fibroblasts morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available