3.9 Article

Impact of different drying methods on nutritional quality of Garcinia cowa and Garcinia pedunculata fruits

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 714-719

Publisher

TRIVENI ENTERPRISES
DOI: 10.22438/jeb/42/3/MRN-1484

Keywords

Antioxidant; Borthekera; Drying method; Garcinia; Kujithekera

Funding

  1. Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to establish a suitable drying process for Garcinia cowa and Garcinia pedunculata fruits to retain their nutritional qualities, finding that oven drying at 50 degrees Celsius with 0.9 cm thickness resulted in better retention of total phenolic and flavonoid contents with improved antioxidant activities.
Aim: The present study was undertaken to establish a suitable drying process for Garcinia cowa and Garcinia pedunculata fruits for maximum retention of their nutritional qualities. Methodology: Slices of three different thickness with 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 cm of G. cowa and G. pedunculata fruits were dried by sun drying, solar drying and by cabinet drying at three different temperatures (50 degrees C, 70 degrees C and 90 degrees C). Results: The mean crude fat and ash content were higher in G. cowa than G. pedunculata while later was found rich in crude protein and Fe contents. Total phenol content ranged between 881.31-888.65 and 719.00-736.74 mg gallic acid equivalent 100 g(-1), total flavonoid content between 89.21-90.06 and 51.00-52.54 mg quercetin equivalent 100 g(-1) and mean HCA contents ranged between 3.13-3.92% and 1.84-1.99% for G. cowa and G. pedunculata, respectively. The methanolic extracts exhibited significant antioxidant activity. With lower IC50 values, G. cowa had higher antioxidant activity than G. pedunculata. Interpretation: Oven drying at 50 degrees C and 0.9 cm slice thickness for drying resulted in better retention of total phenolic and flavonoid contents with better antioxidant activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available