4.5 Article

Different displacement of bioimpedance vector due to Ag/AgCl electrode effect

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 70, Issue 12, Pages 1401-1407

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.121

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) is increasingly used in clinical research to assess soft tissue hydration. It is known that physical characteristics of electrodes, such as low intrinsic impedance, low electrode/skin contact impedance and type of gel, affect the reliability of noninvasive bioimpedance assessments. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intrinsic impedance of electrode on the bioimpedance vector displacement in RXc graph. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The intrinsic impedance is measured in nine pregelled disposable Ag/AgCI electrodes usually used for bioimpedance measures. The BIVA method is performed on 35 healthy volunteers using a 50 kHz phase-sensitive bioimpedance analyzer (BIA 101 Anniversary) with the lowest intrinsic impedance electrode and highest. The individual bioimpedance vector is plotted on the bivariate normal interval of reference population. The differences in the mean bioimpedance vectors obtained with each electrode are plotted, with their 95% confidence ellipses, on the dRXc graph. The paired one-sample Hotelling's T-2-test is used to compare the differences of the mean bioimpedance vectors. RESULTS: We found large variability in intrinsic resistance (11-665 0) and reactance (0.25-2.5 0) values of the electrodes analyzed and significant displacement (P < 0.05) of bioimpedance vector positions in healthy adults according to the paired one-sample Hotelling's T-2-test. CONCLUSIONS: A robust study of all physical characteristics of commercial Ag/AgCI electrodes is necessary to reach consensus on pregelled Ag/AgCI electrodes valid for bioimpedance measurement. This information will enable BIVA users to avoid systemic errors when performing BIVA assessments, specifically when these measurements are used for clinical interpretations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available