Guidelines that use the GRADE approach often fail to provide complete economic information for recommendations: a Systematic Survey
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Guidelines that use the GRADE approach often fail to provide complete economic information for recommendations: a Systematic Survey
Authors
Keywords
Cost-benefit analysis, Economics, Health care costs, Evidence-based medicine, Practice guidelines, Epidemiological research design
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-05-11
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.018
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: A structured analysis of characteristics and methods applied
- (2019) Miriam Luhnen et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Review of evidence based clinical practice guidelines developed in Latin America and Caribbean during the last decade: an analysis of the methods for grading quality of evidence and topic prioritization
- (2019) Paula Andrea Cabrera et al. Globalization and Health
- GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions
- (2019) Nancy Santesso et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Most guideline organizations lack explicit guidance in how to incorporate cost considerations
- (2019) Andrea Juliana Sanabria et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Decision-making frameworks and considerations for informing coverage decisions for healthcare interventions: a critical interpretive synthesis
- (2018) Rebecca L. Morgan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT
- (2017) Holger J. Schünemann et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health
- (2016) Holger J. Schünemann et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines
- (2016) Pablo Alonso-Coello et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction
- (2016) Pablo Alonso-Coello et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines
- (2016) Pablo Alonso-Coello et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction
- (2016) Pablo Alonso-Coello et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels
- (2015) Ignacio Neumann et al. Implementation Science
- Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers
- (2012) Noor Tromp et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- A systematic review of coverage decision-making on health technologies—Evidence from the real world
- (2012) Katharina Elisabeth Fischer HEALTH POLICY
- Introducing GRADE across the NICE clinical guideline program
- (2012) Judith Thornton et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence
- (2012) Massimo Brunetti et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Going from evidence to recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started