Penalization and shrinkage methods produced unreliable clinical prediction models especially when sample size was small
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Penalization and shrinkage methods produced unreliable clinical prediction models especially when sample size was small
Authors
Keywords
Risk prediction models, Penalization, Shrinkage, Overfitting, Sample size
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 88-96
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2020-12-09
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.12.005
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Regression shrinkage methods for clinical prediction models do not guarantee improved performance: Simulation study
- (2020) Ben Van Calster et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model
- (2020) Richard D Riley et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and related metrics for quantifying the calibration of logistic regression models
- (2019) Peter C. Austin et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes
- (2018) Richard D Riley et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: Part I - Continuous outcomes
- (2018) Richard D. Riley et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A calibration hierarchy for risk models was defined: from utopia to empirical data
- (2016) Ben Van Calster et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration
- (2015) Karel G.M. Moons et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study
- (2015) Gary S. Collins et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- How to develop a more accurate risk prediction model when there are few events
- (2015) Menelaos Pavlou et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- How to develop a more accurate risk prediction model when there are few events
- (2015) Menelaos Pavlou et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
- (2015) Jerome Friedman et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models
- (2014) Kirsten Van Hoorde et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Stabilizing the lasso against cross-validation variability
- (2013) S. Roberts et al. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS
- Meta-analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data
- (2013) Richard D. Riley et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- An evaluation of penalised survival methods for developing prognostic models with rare events
- (2011) G. Ambler et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search