4.7 Article

The Challenge of Accurate Computation of Two-Photon Absorption Properties of Organic Chromophores in the Condensed Phase

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 3652-3665

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00204

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020-172532]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_172532] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two strategies were used to evaluate the environment impact on the two-photon absorption cross sections in excited states of C2H4. The supermolecular approach is basis-set-sensitive, while the embedding strategy shows similar basis-set behavior. The results indicate challenges in accuracy and deviations from reference shifts.
Two strategies are applied to evaluate the effect of the environment on the two-photon absorption (TPA) cross sections for two characteristic excited states of C2H4 upon complexation with H2O. The supermolecular strategy provides the reference complexation-induced shifts and uses either the EOM-CCSD or ADC(2) method. The embedding strategy is based on frozen-density-embedding theory (FDET) and uses only fundamental constants. The TPA cross sections from high-level supermolecular calculations are extremely basis-set-sensitive. Literature data and the present study indicate that accuracy of the absolute TPA cross sections below 100 atomic units and their shifts below 10 atomic units remains a challenge. The obtained FDET results show a similar basis-set behavior. For the largest basis set (d-aug-cc-pVQZ), TPA cross sections obtained from these two strategies are in excellent agreement. The complexation-induced shifts have the correct sign of the effect and a small (12-33%) relative error in magnitude. The deviations of the FDET-derived shifts from the reference are of similar magnitude as the reliability threshold of the reference shifts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available