4.4 Article

The first step in ensuring patient-centred quality of care: ask the patient

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12435

Keywords

cancer; patient-centred care; quality of care; medical oncology

Funding

  1. National Health & Medical Research Council [1010536]
  2. Cancer Council NSW [CSR 11-02]
  3. Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI)
  4. Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Health providers may not be aware of their patients' needs or preferences, and patients reluctant to raise their concerns. Consequently, the first step in ensuring quality of care is to ask the patient about the care that they would like. A cross-sectional sample of 244 medical oncology outpatients were surveyed about provider-asking behaviours across six dimensions of patient-centred care defined by the Institute of Medicine. Specifically, were patients asked by clinic staff at the treatment centre about their physical and emotional symptoms, information needs to enable decision-making, preferences for involvement in decision-making, involvement of family and friends, and appointment scheduling. Patients were significantly (Cochran's chi(2) (9) = 122.541, P < 0.001) less likely to be asked about emotional symptoms (35% infrequently asked), preferences for the involvement of family and friends (25% infrequently asked), and preferences for involvement in medical decision-making (23% infrequently asked). Only a minority of patients were infrequently asked about their treatment-related information needs (8%), physical symptoms (13% pain, 14% fatigue) and preferences for appointment scheduling (13%). Younger age, not Australian born and greater educational qualifications were associated with being infrequently asked. Improvements to care delivery can be made if clinic staff were to more regularly elicit patient's emotional symptoms, and their preferences for the involvement of family/friends and participation in medical decision-making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available