4.7 Review

Real-world clinical performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests in suspected COVID-19: A systematic meta-analysis of available data as of November 20, 2020

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 592-602

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.029

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Rapid antigen test; Point-of-care testing; Immunoassay; Lateral flow

Funding

  1. Roche Diagnostics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic meta-analysis to compare the real-world performance of different commercially available RATs for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection. It found that RATs offered by Roche Diagnostics/SD Biosensor and Abbott had the highest sensitivity and are recommended for detecting current SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in high-viral-load populations.
Objectives: Rapid antigen tests, or RATs, are a type of lateral flow chromatographic immunoassay utilized to aid the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We performed a systematic meta-analysis to compare the real-world performance of commercially available RATs. Methods: We searched several databases and websites for manufacturer-independent prospective clinical performance studies comparing SARS-CoV-2 RATs and RT-PCR. Only studies on RATs that did not need a separate reader for result retrieval and that reported data on viral load, patients' symptom status, sample type, and PCR assay used were included. Results: 19 studies utilizing 11,109 samples with 2,509 RT-PCR-positives were included. RAT sensitivity varied between 28.9% (95% CI 16.4-44.3) and 98.3% (95% CI 91.1-99.7), likely dependent upon population characteristics, viral load, and symptom status. RAT specificity varied between 92.4% (95% CI 87.4-95.9) and 100% (95% CI 99.7-100) with one outlier. The RATs by Roche Diagnostics/SD Biosensor and Abbott had the highest pooled sensitivity (82.4% [95% CI 74.2-88.4] and 76.9% [95% CI 72.1-81.2], respectively). Sensitivity in high-viral-load samples (cycle threshold <25) showed heterogeneity among the different RATs. Conclusion: The RATs offered by Roche Diagnostics/SD Biosensor and Abbott provide sufficient manufacturer-independent, real-world performance data to support their use to detect current SARSCoV-2 infection, particularly in high-viral-load populations. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available