4.5 Article

Retrospective study of prognosis of patients with multiple colorectal carcinomas: synchronous versus metachronous makes the difference

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 1487-1498

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03926-6

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Multiple cancers; Synchronous cancers; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this analysis, a total of 3714 patients were included, with 3506 (94.4%) having primary unifocal colorectal cancer (PCRC), 103 (2.7%) having SCRC, and 105 (2.8%) having MCRC. SCRC occurred more frequently in elderly and male patients. Patients with SCRC did not show altered recurrence or survival rates, while MCRC had lower rates of recurrence and cause-specific death compared to PCRC.
Purpose Little is known about difference between synchronous colorectal cancer (SCRC) and metachronous colorectal cancer (MCRC) despite the relevance for this selected patient group. The aim of this retrospective review was to analyze patients with SCRC and MCRC. Methods All patients who underwent surgery for SCRC and MCRC between 1982 and 2019 were included in this retrospective analysis of our tertiary referral center. Clinical, histological, and molecular genetic characteristics were analyzed. The primary endpoint was cause-specific survival, evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival and the identification of prognostic factors. Results Overall, 3714 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 3506 (94.4%) had a primary unifocal colorectal cancer (PCRC), 103 (2.7%) had SCRC, and 105 (2.8%) had MCRC. SCRC occurred more frequently in elderly (p=0.009) and in male patients (p=0.027). There were no differences concerning tumor stages or grading. Patients with SCRC did not show altered recurrence or survival rates, as compared to unifocal tumors. However, MCRC had a lower rate of recurrence, compared to PCRC (24% vs. 41%, p=0.002) and a lower rate of cause-specific death (13% vs. 37%, p<0.001). Five-year cause-specific survival rates were 63 +/- 1% for PCRC, 62 +/- 6% for SCRC (p=0.588), and 88 +/- 4% for MCRC (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that MCRC were an independent favorable prognostic parameter regarding case-specific survival. Conclusion Patients with SCRC seem to not have a worse prognosis compared to patients with PCRC. Noteworthy, patients with MCRC showed better survival rates in this retrospective analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available