4.6 Article

Typical 22q11.2 deletion syndrome appears to confer a reduced risk of schwannoma

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1779-1782

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01175-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre [IS-BRC-1215-20007]
  2. USAMRAA CDMRP Neurofibromatosis Research Program, Investigator-Initiated Research Award [W81XWH1910334]
  3. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [W81XWH1910334] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There were no reports of schwannoma in over 1,500 patients with 22q11.2DS, and no patients meeting clinical diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis had a whole-gene deletion in LZTR1. The study suggests that individuals with 22q11.2DS may have a reduced risk of developing schwannomas compared to the general population.
PURPOSE The LZTR1 gene has been associated with schwannomatosis tumor predisposition and is located in a region that is deleted in the great majority (89%) of patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS). Since it is known that approximately 1 in 500 people in the general population will develop a sporadic schwannoma and there are no reports of the occurrence of schwannoma in 22q11.2DS, we investigated whether whole-gene deletion of LZTR1 occurs in schwannomatosis and assessed the risk of schwannoma in 22q11.2DS. METHODS We assessed the genetic testing results for LZTR1-associated schwannomatosis and the clinical phenotypes of patients with 22q11.2DS. RESULTS There were no reports of schwannoma in over 1,500 patients with 22q11.2DS. In addition, no patients meeting clinical diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis had a whole-gene deletion in LZTR1. Only 1 patient in 110 with an apparently sporadic vestibular schwannoma had a constitutional whole-gene deletion of LZTR1. CONCLUSION People with a large 22q11.2 deletion may have a reduced risk of developing a schwannoma compared to the general population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available