Predictive models of individual risk of elective caesarean section complications: a systematic review
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Predictive models of individual risk of elective caesarean section complications: a systematic review
Authors
Keywords
Caesarean section, Complication, Prognostic model, Predictive model, Risk, Women’s health
Journal
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-05-09
DOI
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.011
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2019) Karel G.M. Moons et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2019) Soha Sobhy et al. LANCET
- UK Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths - still learning to save mothers’ lives
- (2018) D. N. Lucas et al. ANAESTHESIA
- Predictive modeling of emergency cesarean delivery
- (2018) Carlos Campillo-Artero et al. PLoS One
- Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections
- (2018) Ties Boerma et al. LANCET
- Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children
- (2018) Jane Sandall et al. LANCET
- Alarming global rise in caesarean births, figures show
- (2018) Jacqui Wise BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Obstetric spinal hypotension: Preoperative risk factors and the development of a preliminary risk score – the PRAM score
- (2017) D G Bishop et al. SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
- Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?
- (2017) Sarah W Chan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?
- (2017) Sarah W Chan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable
- (2016) C. Emily Kleinrouweler et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014
- (2016) Ana Pilar Betrán et al. PLoS One
- WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates
- (2015) AP Betran et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Calculating probability of requiring allogeneic blood transfusion using three preoperative risk factors on cesarean section for placenta previa
- (2014) Yosuke Baba et al. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
- Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist
- (2014) Karel G. M. Moons et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research
- (2013) Ewout W. Steyerberg et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Validation of models that predict Cesarean section after induction of labor
- (2009) C. J. M. Verhoeven et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started