Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-environmental schemes?
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-environmental schemes?
Authors
Keywords
Sequences of outcomes, Agri-environmental schemes, Discounted utility, Farming practices, Cover crops, Choice experiment
Journal
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages 106946
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-01-23
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106946
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Measuring Farmer Risk Preferences in Europe: A Systematic Review
- (2019) Poorvi Iyer et al. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Using choice experiments to improve the design of agri-environmental schemes
- (2019) Uwe Latacz-Lohmann et al. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Understanding farmers' reluctance to reduce pesticide use: A choice experiment
- (2019) Benoît Chèze et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- Preferences for biodiversity offset contracts on arable land: a choice experiment study with farmers
- (2018) Anne-Charlotte Vaissière et al. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Structural estimation of farmers’ risk and ambiguity preferences: a field experiment
- (2017) Douadia Bougherara et al. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Protest Responses and Willingness to Accept: Ecosystem Services Providers’ Preferences towards Incentive-Based Schemes
- (2017) Anastasio J. Villanueva et al. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software
- (2017) Emily Lancsar et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force
- (2016) A. Brett Hauber et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus
- (2015) Laure Kuhfuss et al. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania: An assessment of payment approaches
- (2013) David Kaczan et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers' risk behaviour from field-experiment data
- (2013) Géraldine Bocquého et al. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Farmer Discount Rates: Experimental Evidence
- (2011) E. Duquette et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Modeling farmer participation in agri-environmental nitrate pollution reducing schemes
- (2011) Eirini Giovanopoulou et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- Determinants of farmers’ willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones—A choice experiment study
- (2011) Tove Christensen et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- Marginal Changes in Random Parameters Ordered Response Models with Interaction Terms
- (2011) Andreas C. Drichoutis et al. Econometric Reviews
- Experimental methods and the welfare evaluation of policy lotteries
- (2011) G. W. Harrison EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments
- (2010) David Hoyos ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- What Do Farmers Want From Agri-Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach
- (2010) Maria Espinosa-Goded et al. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Utility in Willingness to Pay Space: A Tool to Address Confounding Random Scale Effects in Destination Choice to the Alps
- (2008) Riccardo Scarpa et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
- Eliciting Risk and Time Preferences
- (2008) Steffen Andersen et al. ECONOMETRICA
- Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment
- (2007) Arne Risa Hole JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started