Risky Courtship: Background Contrast, Ornamentation, and Display Behavior of Wolf Spiders Affect Visual Detection by Toad Predators

Current Status and Future Directions of Research in Complex Signaling

(2016) Eileen A. Hebets   Current Zoology

Social experience affects female mate preferences for a visual trait in a wolf spider

(2015) Brent Stoffer et al.   BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY

The effects of social experience with varying male availability on female mate preferences in a wolf spider

(2015) Brent Stoffer et al.   BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY

Multimodal signals increase active space of communication by wolf spiders in a complex litter environment

(2013) George W. Uetz et al.   BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY

Female hunger state affects mate choice of a sexually selected trait in a wolf spider

(2011) Brian Moskalik et al.   ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR

The degree of response to increased predation risk corresponds to male secondary sexual traits

(2011) K. D. Fowler-Finn et al.   BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY

Spectral reflectance and communication in the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz): simultaneous crypsis and background contrast in visual signals

(2011) David L. Clark et al.   BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY

Contrasting energetic costs of courtship signaling in two wolf spiders having divergent courtship behaviors

(2011) Alan B. Cady et al.   JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY

Effect of visual background complexity and light level on the detection of visual signals of male Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders by female conspecifics

(2010) George W. Uetz et al.   BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY

More Ornamented Males Exhibit Increased Predation Risk and Antipredatory Escapes, but not Greater Mortality

(2010) Kasey D. Fowler-Finn et al.   ETHOLOGY

Antipredator responses of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) to sensory cues representing an avian predator

(2009) Anne K. Lohrey et al.   ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR

Discrimination of Variation in a Male Signaling Trait Affects Detection Time in Visual Predators

(2008) J. Andrew Roberts et al.   ETHOLOGY