Diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of a biomarker and EMR‐based machine learning algorithm for sepsis
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of a biomarker and EMR‐based machine learning algorithm for sepsis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CTS-Clinical and Translational Science
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2021-03-31
DOI
10.1111/cts.13030
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Development and Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Identification of Patients at Risk for Sepsis
- (2019) Ryan J. Delahanty et al. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Monocyte Distribution Width
- (2019) Elliott D. Crouser et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- The usefulness of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin to predict prognosis in septic shock patients: A multicenter prospective registry-based observational study
- (2019) Seung Mok Ryoo et al. Scientific Reports
- Validation of a Host Response Assay, Septicyte™ LAB, for Discriminating Sepsis from SIRS in the ICU
- (2018) Russell R Miller III et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU
- (2018) Shamim Nemati et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Presenting Symptoms Independently Predict Mortality in Septic Shock
- (2018) Michael R. Filbin et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Commentary: Arguing for Adaptive Clinical Trials in Sepsis
- (2018) Miriam Kesselmeier et al. Frontiers in Immunology
- Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014
- (2017) Chanu Rhee et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R
- (2017) Marvin N. Wright et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis
- (2017) Christopher W. Seymour et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Combining Biomarkers with EMR Data to Identify Patients in Different Phases of Sepsis
- (2017) Ishan Taneja et al. Scientific Reports
- Role of interleukin-6 to differentiate sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome
- (2016) Li Ma et al. CYTOKINE
- Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis
- (2016) Christopher W. Seymour et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
- (2016) Mervyn Singer et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Sepsis and septic shock
- (2016) Richard S. Hotchkiss et al. Nature Reviews Disease Primers
- A targeted real-time early warning score (TREWScore) for septic shock
- (2015) Katharine E. Henry et al. Science Translational Medicine
- The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets
- (2015) Takaya Saito et al. PLoS One
- Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Reduces Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock From the First Hour
- (2014) Ricard Ferrer et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2014) Kuan-Ho Lin et al. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
- Rapid diagnosis of sepsis
- (2013) Frank Bloos et al. Virulence
- Association between timing of antibiotic administration and mortality from septic shock in patients treated with a quantitative resuscitation protocol*
- (2011) Michael A. Puskarich et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure
- (2010) André Altmann et al. BIOINFORMATICS
- Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department*
- (2010) David F. Gaieski et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More