4.5 Article

Population dynamics and genotypic richness of threatened Acropora species and their hybrid in the US Virgin Islands

Journal

CORAL REEFS
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 965-971

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-021-02093-y

Keywords

Acropora cervicornis; Acropora palmata; Acropora prolifera; Hybridization; Coral reefs

Funding

  1. NSF [OCE-1538469/OCE-1929979]
  2. NOAA CRCP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found 35 hybrid genotypes in three sites in the U.S. Virgin Islands, suggesting multiple hybridizations events have occurred. While there was no significant difference in genotypic richness across sites for A. cervicornis, A. prolifera, and A. palmata, the research revealed stable hybrid percent cover over time in certain locations. This indicates that acroporid hybrids may become the primary shallow reef-builders in some areas previously occupied by parental species.
Acropora cervicornis and A. palmata have experienced substantial losses in coral cover throughout the Caribbean, but their hybrid (A. prolifera) appears to be increasing at some sites. The shifts in relative abundance could result from hybridization with subsequent asexual fragmentation, recent increased hybridization, or a disproportionate loss in the parental species. Here, acroporid taxa from three U.S. Virgin Islands sites were genotyped revealing 35 hybrid genotypes, suggesting multiple hybridization events. Genotypic richness in A. cervicornis (0.62), A. prolifera (0.64), and A. palmata (0.68) was not significantly different across sites. To further explore acroporid dynamics at these sites, we analyzed existing photo transects from 2009 to 2017 to reveal significant losses of A. cervicornis but stable hybrid percent cover. High genotypic richness and stable populations suggest acroporid hybrids may become the primary shallow reef-builders in some locations previously occupied by the parental species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available