4.6 Article

Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Patients with Drug-Eluting Stents and Kidney Failure

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12120720

Keywords

drug eluting stents; maintenance dialysis; prasugrel; ticagrelor myocardial infarction

Funding

  1. Universite de Geneve [2178281.02.0001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prasugrel and ticagrelor do not show significant benefits compared with clopidogrel in terms of reducing cardiovascular events in patients with kidney failure treated with drug-eluting stents. However, there may be a slightly higher incidence of bleeding events with prasugrel or ticagrelor.
Background and objectives Prasugrel and ticagrelor have superior efficacy compared with clopidogrel in moderate CKD but have not been studied in kidney failure. The study objective is to determine the effectiveness and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in kidney failure. Design, setting, participants, & measurements This retrospective cohort study used United States Renal Data System data from 2012 to 2015. We identified all patients on dialysis who received a drug-eluting stent and were alive at 90 days after stent implantation. Inverse probabilityweighted Cox proportional hazard models were used. Weights were estimated with propensity scores for multiple treatments. Results This cohort included 6648 patients on clopidogrel, 621 on prasugrel, and 449 on ticagrelor. A total of 3279 primary composite (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and 2120 clinically relevant bleeding events were observed. The incidence of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months was similar across the three treatment groups. The absolute event rate in the unweighted cohort was 144 events per 100 patient-years for clopidogrel, 126 for prasugrel, and 161 for ticagrelor. For prasugrel versus clopidogrel, the weighted hazard ratio was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.11; P=0.58). For ticagrelor versus clopidogrel, the hazard ratio was 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.20; P=0.98). A numerically higher incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was seen with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (weighted hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.38 and weighted hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.40, respectively). Conclusions Prasugrel or ticagrelor does not seem to be associated with significant benefits compared with clopidogrel in patients with kidney failure treated with drug-eluting stents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available