4.3 Article

Assessment of Total, PTEN-, and AR-V7+ Circulating Tumor Cell Count by Flow Cytometry in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Enzalutamide

Journal

CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages E286-E298

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.021

Keywords

Hormonal therapy; Liquid biopsy; Abiraterone; MDV3100; LHRH agonist

Funding

  1. Consorzio Oncotech, a nonprofit organization of University Federico II of Naples
  2. Astellas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flow cytometry was used to assess total, PTEN-, and AR-V7(+) circulating tumor cell count in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide, providing potentially useful prognostic and predictive information for the treatment outcomes.
Assessment of total, PTEN and AR-V7+ circulating tumor cells count by flow cytometry in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide. In this study men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, scheduled to start enzalutamide, were assessed for circulating tumor cells count and molecular characterization (total, PTEN and AR-V7+ circulating tumor cells count) by the use of flow cytometry. We found that flow cytometry could be used to enumerate circulating tumor cells, but also to assess molecular biomarkers on their surface. Introduction. Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a deadly disease. Enzalutamide is an oral second-generation anti-androgen that is active in mCRPC. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) count correlates with overall survival (OS) in mCRPC, whereas detection of the androgen-receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) in CTC predicts poor response to oral second-generation anti-androgens. Also, loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) in CTC is a biomarker of poor prognosis in mCRPC. Patients and methods. In this translational study, we employed flow cytometry to assess total, PTEN-, and AR-V7(+) CTC count per 7.5 mL of whole blood in a prospective cohort of patients with mCRPC receiving enzalutamide. Results. CTCs were assessed in a total of 45 men with mCRPC at baseline and at 12 weeks. Overall, CTC, PTEN- CTC, and AR-V7(+) CTC detection rate was high, at baseline, with 84.4%, 71.1%, and 51.1% of samples showing at least 1 cell/7.5-mL blood, respectively, and after 3 months, with 93.3%, 64.4%, and 77.7% of samples showing at least 1 cell/7.5-mL blood, respectively. Median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and OS were 6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-9) and 14.3 (95% CI, 12.8-20.3) months, respectively. Median (interquartile range) total CTC count at baseline was 5 (3; 8), whereas median (interquartile range) PTEN- CTC count was 2 (0; 4) and median (interquartile range) AR-V7(+) CTC count was 1 (0; 3). At baseline, >= 5 versus < 5 total CTC count was associated with worse rPFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35; 95% CI, 1.14-4.84; P=.021) and OS (HR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.45-6.54; P =.003), whereas >= 2 versus < 2 PTEN- CTC count was associated with worse rPFS (HR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.8-8.72; P=.001) and OS (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.12-5; P=.025). Finally, >= 1 versus < 1 AR-V7(+) CTC count was also associated with worse rPFS (HR, 5.05; 95% CI, 2.4-10.64; P <.001) and OS (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.1-4.58; P=.026). Conclusions. Despite multiple limitations, including the small sample size, our preliminary study suggests that assessment of CTC via flow cytometry may provide potentially useful prognostic and predictive information in advanced prostate cancer. Further studies are warranted. Micro-Abstract: In this study, men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, scheduled to start enzalutamide, were assessed for circulating tumor cell count and molecular characterization (total, PTEN-, and AR-V7(+) circulating tumor cell count) by the use of flow cytometry. We found that flow cytometry could be used to enumerate circulating tumor cells, but also to assess molecular biomarkers on their surface. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available