4.6 Review

Recent progress in flexible supporting technology for aerospace thin-walled parts: A review

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 10-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2021.01.026

Keywords

Aerospace; Chatter; Deformation; Flexible support; Low rigidity; Thin-walled

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [51975096, 51905075]
  2. China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation [2019M661090]
  3. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1807230]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the recent research progress of flexible supporting technologies in the aerospace field by classifying them based on different principles and characteristics, elucidating the principles, progress, advantages, and limitations of the technologies by systematic comparison, and discussing the challenges and future development trends, providing guidelines for further research.
Thin-walled parts are widely used in the aerospace industry owing to their light weight and high specific strength. However, due to the low rigidity of thin-walled parts, elastic deformation and chatter easily occur, which seriously affect the machining accuracy and workpiece surface quality. To solve this problem, several supporting technologies have been reported in recent years. This paper reviews the recent research progress of flexible supporting technologies in the aerospace field by classifying them based on different principles and characteristics. The principle, progress, advantages, and limitations of the technologies are expounded by systematic comparison and summarized. Finally, the challenges and future development trends of flexible supporting technology, which will provide guidelines for further research, are discussed.(c) 2021 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available