4.7 Review

Role of oxidative stress in calcific aortic valve disease and its therapeutic implications

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages 1433-1451

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvab142

Keywords

Aortic valve; Calcification; Reactive oxygen species; Oxidative stress; NADPH oxidases

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation [PG/17/39/33027, CH/1999001/11735]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470506]
  3. Key Research Project of the Heart Center of XinxiangMedical University [2017360]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in western populations. Currently, there are no pharmacological therapies available for CAVD, making it crucial to understand the mechanisms underlying the disease in order to identify novel therapeutic targets.
Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is the end result of active cellular processes that lead to the progressive fibrosis and calcification of aortic valve leaflets. In western populations, CAVD is a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and in the absence of effective drugs, it will likely represent an increasing disease burden as populations age. As there are currently no pharmacological therapies available for preventing, treating, or slowing the development of CAVD, understanding the mechanisms underlying the initiation and progression of the disease is important for identifying novel therapeutic targets. Recent evidence has emerged of an important causative role for reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of CAVD, inducing the differentiation of valve interstitial cells into myofibroblasts and then osteoblasts. In this review, we focus on the roles and sources of ROS driving CAVD and consider their potential as novel therapeutic targets for this debilitating condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available