4.4 Review

Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review

Journal

BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages 41-57

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab005

Keywords

mindfulness-based interventions; biopsychosocial health; safety; ethics; compliance; mechanisms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mindfulness-based interventions have been found effective for improving various biopsychosocial conditions in healthcare, schools, and workplace settings. However, there is still controversy and insufficient evidence on the effects of MBIs on certain conditions such as PTSD and ADHD, as well as uncertainties regarding the cost-effectiveness for many health conditions and populations. Further high-quality research is needed to clarify these issues and explore new areas for development.
Introduction: This is an overall review on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). Sources of data: We identified studies in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, Web of Science and Google Scholar using keywords including 'mindfulness', 'meditation', and 'review', 'meta-analysis' or their variations. Areas of agreement: MBIs are effective for improving many biopsychosocial conditions, including depression, anxiety, stress, insomnia, addiction, psychosis, pain, hypertension, weight control, cancer-related symptoms and prosocial behaviours. It is found to be beneficial in the healthcare settings, in schools and workplace but further research is warranted to look into its efficacy on different problems. MBIs are relatively safe, but ethical aspects should be considered. Mechanisms are suggested in both empirical and neurophysiological findings. Cost-effectiveness is found in treating some health conditions. Areas of controversy: Inconclusive or only preliminary evidence on the effects of MBIs on PTSD, ADHD, ASD, eating disorders, loneliness and physical symptoms of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and respiratory conditions. Furthermore, some beneficial effects are not confirmed in subgroup populations. Cost-effectiveness is yet to confirm for many health conditions and populations. Growing points: Many mindfulness systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate low quality of included studies, hence high-quality studies with adequate sample size and longer follow-up period are needed. Areas timely for developing research: More research is needed on online mindfulness trainings and interventions to improve biopsychosocial health during the COVID-19 pandemic; Deeper understanding of the mechanisms of MBIs integrating both empirical and neurophysiological findings; Longterm compliance and effects of MBIs; and development of mindfulness plus (mindfulness+) or personalized mindfulness programs to elevate the effectiveness for different purposes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available