4.5 Article

Identifying the epileptogenic zone in interictal resting-state MEG source-space networks

Journal

EPILEPSIA
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 137-148

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.13622

Keywords

Epilepsy; Neurosurgery; Functional network; Hub; Betweenness centrality; Beamformer-based virtual electrodes

Funding

  1. Dutch Epilepsy Foundation [14-16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveIn one third of patients, seizures remain after epilepsy surgery, meaning that improved preoperative evaluation methods are needed to identify the epileptogenic zone. A potential framework for such a method is network theory, as it can be applied to noninvasive recordings, even in the absence of epileptiform activity. Our aim was to identify the epileptogenic zone on the basis of hub status of local brain areas in interictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) networks. MethodsPreoperative eyes-closed resting-state MEG recordings were retrospectively analyzed in 22 patients with refractory epilepsy, of whom 14 were seizure-free 1 year after surgery. Beamformer-based time series were reconstructed for 90 cortical and subcortical automated anatomic labeling (AAL) regions of interest (ROIs). Broadband functional connectivity was estimated using the phase lag index in artifact-free epochs without interictal epileptiform abnormalities. A minimum spanning tree was generated to represent the network, and the hub status of each ROI was calculated using betweenness centrality, which indicates the centrality of a node in a network. The correspondence of resection cavity to hub values was evaluated on four levels: resection cavity, lobar, hemisphere, and temporal versus extratemporal areas. ResultsHubs were localized within the resection cavity in 8 of 14 seizure-free patients and in zero of 8 patients who were not seizure-free (57% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 73% accuracy). Hubs were localized in the lobe of resection in 9 of 14 seizure-free patients and in zero of 8 patients who were not seizure-free (64% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 77% accuracy). For the other two levels, the true negatives are unknown; hence, only sensitivity could be determined: hubs coincided with both the resection hemisphere and the resection location (temporal versus extratemporal) in 11 of 14 seizure-free patients (79% sensitivity). SignificanceIdentifying hubs noninvasively before surgery is a valuable approach with the potential of indicating the epileptogenic zone in patients without interictal abnormalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available