4.1 Article

An examination of sedation requirements and practices for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with COVID-19

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY
Volume 78, Issue 21, Pages 1952-1961

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab202

Keywords

COVID-19; critical illness; mechanical ventilation; sedation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston investigated sedation practices for critically ill patients with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation. The findings showed significantly increased sedative and analgesic infusions surpassing recommended dosage guidelines, as well as characteristics of patients requiring multiple agents including younger age, increased body mass index, and higher inflammatory markers.
Purpose. Preliminary reports suggest that critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection requiring mechanical ventilation may have markedly increased sedation needs compared with critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients without COVID-19. We conducted a study to examine sedative use for this patient population within multiple intensive care units (ICUs) of a large academic medical center. Methods. A retrospective, single-center cohort study of sedation practices for critically ill patients with COVID-19 during the first 10 days of mechanical ventilation was conducted in 8 ICUs at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. The study population was a sequential cohort of 86 critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Data characterizing the sedative medications, doses, drug combinations, and duration of administration were collected daily and compared to published recommendations for sedation of critically ill patients without COVID-19. The associations between drug doses, number of drugs administered, baseline patient characteristics, and inflammatory markers were investigated. Results. Among the study cohort, propofol and hydromorphone were the most common initial drug combination, with these medications being used on a given day in up to 100% and 88% of patients, respectively. The doses of sedative and analgesic infusions increased for patients over the first 10 days, reaching or exceeding the upper limits of published dosage guidelines for propofol (48% of patients), dexmedetomidine (29%), midazolam (7.7%), ketamine (32%), and hydromorphone (38%). The number of sedative and analgesic agents simultaneously administered increased over time for each patient, with more than 50% of patients requiring 3 or more agents by day 2. Compared with patients requiring 3 or fewer agents, patients requiring more than 3 agents were of younger age, had an increased body mass index, had increased serum ferritin and lactate dehydrogenase concentrations, had a lower Pao(2):Fio(2) (ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen), and were more likely to receive neuromuscular blockade. Conclusion. Our study confirmed the clinical impression of elevated sedative use in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 relative to guideline-recommended sedation practices in other critically ill populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available