4.1 Article

Technology 4.0 with 0.0 costs: fuzzy model of lettuce productivity with magnetized water

Journal

ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

UNIV ESTADUAL MARINGA, PRO-REITORIA PESQUISA POS-GRADUACAO
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v43i1.51384

Keywords

fuzzy model; agriculture 4.0; elementary math; horticulture; magnetized water

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [421782/2016-1, 303923/2018-0, 313570/2017-5, 315228/2020-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of 4.0 technologies to develop a decision model with a 0.0 cost is attractive to small farmers, offering a pathway to achieve sustainable development goals by 2030. This research focuses on developing a 4.0 mathematical model based on fuzzy concepts to verify the benefits of irrigating lettuce with magnetically treated water at different replacement rates, utilizing both computational software and manual methods. Mathematical modeling aims to understand natural phenomena associated with specific areas of knowledge, with fuzzy-rule-based systems being widely used in in-depth research.
In agriculture with 4.0 technologies, developing a decision model with a 0.0 cost is attractive to small farmers. In water management, if this approach could be used to promote sustainability and optimization, it could become a pathway to reach the sustainable development goal in 2030. The core of this work is the development of a 4.0 mathematical model (based on fuzzy concepts) to verify the benefits of the production of lettuce irrigated with magnetically treated water at different replacement rates. This approach is achieved using computational 4.0 software and manual methods. The aim of mathematical modeling is to understand or explain a natural phenomenon associated with a given area of knowledge, and fuzzy-rule-based systems have been widely used in different types of in-depth research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available