4.7 Article

Facilitated Coating of Li3PO4 on the Rough Surface of LiNi0.85Co0.1Mn0.05O2 Cathodes by Synchronous Lithiation

Journal

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 2257-2265

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c02773

Keywords

Ni-rich cathode; synchronous lithiation; Li3PO4 coating; rough surface; high rate; lithium-ion batteries

Funding

  1. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2020YFG0418, 2019JDJQ0046]
  2. NSAF [U1930208]
  3. Laboratory of Precision Manufacturing Technology Foundation [ZM18002]
  4. CAEP Foundation [CX20200009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A LiNi0.85Co0.1Mn0.05O2 cathode material with a uniform Li3PO4 coating was successfully designed and fabricated, showing improved electrochemical performance with higher initial Coulombic efficiency, promising capacity retention, and favorable rate performance.
Ni-rich cathode materials used in power cells have attracted great attention on account of their higher specific capacity at a lower price. Nevertheless, their inherent shortcomings suppress their large-scale commercial applications. Therefore, a LiNi0.85Co0.1Mn0.05O2 cathode material with a uniform Li3PO4 coating is designed and fabricated successfully through a facile synchronous lithiation process. The morphology and structure of these materials are detected by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). The electrochemical performance with different coating amounts is also studied in detail. The results obtained using the above techniques prove that a uniform coating layer with moderate thickness could result in an enhanced initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) of 89.1%, a promising capacity retention of 94.3%, and a favorable rate performance of 80.0 mA h.g(-1) at 10C rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available