Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JAMA Network Open
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages e2037657
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Online
2021-03-12
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37657
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
- (2020) Michael Ahdoot et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- The Four-Kallikrein Panel Is Effective in Identifying Aggressive Prostate Cancer in a Multiethnic Population
- (2020) Burcu F. Darst et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit–harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study
- (2019) Tom Callender et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS)
- (2018) Rita Faria et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Screening for Prostate Cancer
- (2018) et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
- (2018) Veeru Kasivisvanathan et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Polygenic hazard score to guide screening for aggressive prostate cancer: development and validation in large scale cohorts
- (2018) Tyler M Seibert et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Polygenic hazard score to guide screening for aggressive prostate cancer: development and validation in large scale cohorts
- (2018) Tyler M Seibert et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer
- (2018) Nora Pashayan et al. JAMA Oncology
- Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2018) Dragan Ilic et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Germline variation at 8q24 and prostate cancer risk in men of European ancestry
- (2018) Marco Matejcic et al. Nature Communications
- Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
- (2017) Hashim U Ahmed et al. LANCET
- PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2
- (2016) Jeffrey C. Weinreb et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
- (2016) Freddie C. Hamdy et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis
- (2015) Nora Pashayan et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Estimating the cost of caring for people with cancer at the end of life: A modelling study
- (2015) Jeff Round et al. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
- Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up
- (2014) Fritz H Schröder et al. LANCET
- Quality-of-Life Effects of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
- (2012) Eveline A.M. Heijnsdijk et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Using Health State Utility Values from the General Population to Approximate Baselines in Decision Analytic Models when Condition-Specific Data are Not Available
- (2011) Roberta Ara et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Mean sojourn time, overdiagnosis and reduction in advanced stage prostate cancer due to screening with PSA: implications of sojourn time on screening
- (2009) N Pashayan et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started