4.3 Article

Y-chromosome loss is frequent in male renal tumors

Journal

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3061

Keywords

Y-loss; renal cell neoplasm; fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH); prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loss of the Y-chromosome is a common event in different tumor types, with a frequency of 47% in male renal tumors analyzed in this study. Y-loss was most prevalent in papillary RCC, suggesting a potentially relevant prognostic biomarker for favorable disease outcome.
Background: Loss of the Y-chromosome is a common event in different tumor types but its prevalence and clinical relevance in renal cell tumors is still not understood. Methods: It was the aim of this study to estimate the frequency and clinical relevance of Y-loss in kidney neoplasms. A cohort of 1,252 male renal tumors was analyzed in a tissue microarray format by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Results: Y-loss was found in 47% of tumors. The frequency of this alteration varied markedly between kidney tumor subtypes. Y-loss was most prevalent in papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (77%) followed by chromophobe RCC (60%), oncocytoma (51%), clear cell RCC (39%) and clear cell (tubulo)papillary RCC (19%). Y-loss was linked to higher patient age and smaller tumor size at diagnosis. Mean age (95% CI) was 65 (64-66) years in patients with Y-loss in their tumor compared to 60 (58-61) years in patients without Y-loss (P<0.0001). Significant correlations between Y-loss and tumor phenotype were found only for papillary carcinomas (P=0.002), especially for type 1 (P=0.03). Conclusions: Y-loss is present in different histologic subtypes of renal neoplasm. The highest frequency is in papillary RCC, where it may represent a potentially relevant prognostic biomarker suggesting favorable disease outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available