4.7 Review

Antibody Focusing to Conserved Sites of Vulnerability: The Immunological Pathways for 'Universal' Influenza Vaccines

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020125

Keywords

influenza virus; antibody response; universal vaccine; immunodominance; broadly neutralizing antibodies; B cell immunology

Funding

  1. NIH [R01AI137057, DP2DA042422, R01AI124378, R01AI153098, R01AI155447, F31Al138368]
  2. Harvard University Milton Award
  3. Gilead Research Scholars Program Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Influenza virus remains a serious public health burden due to ongoing viral evolution. Current seasonal vaccines elicit strain-specific responses, but universal vaccine development aims to redirect immune responses to conserved sites for broad coverage, which is challenging due to immunological barriers.
Influenza virus remains a serious public health burden due to ongoing viral evolution. Vaccination remains the best measure of prophylaxis, yet current seasonal vaccines elicit strain-specific neutralizing responses that favor the hypervariable epitopes on the virus. This necessitates yearly reformulations of seasonal vaccines, which can be limited in efficacy and also shortchange pandemic preparedness. Universal vaccine development aims to overcome these deficits by redirecting antibody responses to functionally conserved sites of viral vulnerability to enable broad coverage. However, this is challenging as such antibodies are largely immunologically silent, both following vaccination and infection. Defining and then overcoming the immunological basis for such subdominant or 'immuno-recessive' antibody targeting has thus become an important aspect of universal vaccine development. This, coupled with structure-guided immunogen design, has led to proof-of-concept that it is possible to rationally refocus humoral immunity upon normally 'unseen' broadly neutralizing antibody targets on influenza virus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available