4.8 Article

Joint Toxicity of Cadmium and Ionizing Radiation on Zooplankton Carbon Incorporation, Growth and Mobility

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 1527-1535

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04684

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission [Fission-2010-3.5.1-269672]
  2. Strategy for Allied Radioecology
  3. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM)
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The risk of exposure to radioactive elements is seldom assessed considering mixture toxicity, potentially over-or underestimating biological and ecological effects on ecosystems. This study investigated'how three end points, carbon transfer between phytoplankton and Daphnia magna, D. magna mobility and growth, responded to exposure to gamma-radiation in combination with the heavy metal cadmium (Cd), using the MIXTOX approach. Observed effects were compared with mixture effects predicted by concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA) models and with deviations for synergistic/antagonistic (S/A), dose-level (DL), and dose-ratio (DR) dependency interactions. Several patterns of response were observed depending on the end point tested. DL-dependent deviation from the IA model was observed for carbon incorporation with antagonism switching to synergism at higher doses, while the CA model indicated synergism, mainly driven by effects at high doses of gamma-radiation. CA detected= antagonism regarding acute immobilization, while IA predicted DR dependency. Both CA and IA also identified antagonism for daphnid growth. In general, effects of combinations of gamma-radiation and Cd seem to be antagonistic at lower doses, but synergistic at the higher range of.the doses tested. Our results highlight the importance of investigating the effects of exposure to gamma-radiation in a multistressor context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available