4.8 Article

Molecular Characterization of Brown Carbon in Biomass Burning Aerosol Particles

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 21, Pages 11815-11824

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Commerce
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration through Climate Program Office's AC4 program [NA16OAR4310101, NA16OAR4310102]
  3. Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. DOE
  4. US DOE [DEAC06-76RL0 1830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emissions from biomass burning are a significant source of brown carbon (BrC) in the atmosphere. In this study, we investigate the molecular composition of freshly emitted biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) samples collected during test burns of sawgrass, peat, ponderosa pine, and black spruce. We demonstrate that both the BrC absorption and the chemical composition of light-absorbing compounds depend significantly on the type of biomass fuels. Common BrC chromophores in the selected BBOA samples include nitro-aromatics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon derivatives, and polyphenols spanning a wide range of molecular weights, structures, and light absorption properties. A number of biofuel-specific BrC chromophores are observed, indicating that some of them may be used as source-specific markers of BrC. On average, similar to 50% of the light absorption in the solvent-extractable fraction of BBOA can be attributed to a limited number of strong BrC chromophores. The absorption coefficients of BBOA are affected by solar photolysis. Specifically, under typical atmospheric conditions, the 300 nm absorbance decays with a half-life of similar to 16 h. A molecular corridor analysis of the BBOA volatility distribution suggests that many BrC compounds in the fresh BBOA have low saturation mass concentration (<1 mu g m-3) and will be retained in the particle phase under atmospherically relevant conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available