4.6 Article

Designed to Be Noticed: A Reconceptualization of Carbon Food Labels as Warning Labels

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13031581

Keywords

carbon labels; eco-labels; design; awareness; warning labels; noticeability; CO2 emissions; climate action; climate change; approach goals; avoidance goals; attention mechanisms

Funding

  1. Chair of Environmental Ethics Fundacion Tatiana Perez de Guzman El Bueno (Universidad de Alcala)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that carbon labels should trigger bottom-up attention mechanisms to increase their noticeability. By testing different design features and criteria, the effectiveness of communicating carbon information can be enhanced.
Carbon labels are considered a fundamental tool for reducing emissions associated with grocery products. Although the prior literature has shown that both limited motivation and understanding of carbon labels explain the effectiveness of carbon labels, knowledge regarding how to improve the label design to increase noticeability is limited. Given the limited motivation of mainstream consumers to use carbon labels, this exploratory paper proposes that the label design should trigger bottom-up (or sensory-driven) attention mechanisms. Using grounded theory for the data collection and analysis of six focus groups, this study tests six features (i.e., location, size, color, icons, a colored background or border, and textual anchors) and identifies four design criteria (i.e., vividness, incongruity, simplicity, and clarity) that may increase label noticeability. The main conclusion of this qualitative study is that carbon labels are noticed when they are perceived as a cue of hazard. Based on this finding, we propose that carbon labels could be designed as warning labels; therefore, the insights already proven in the warning label literature should be applied to carbon label design to increase its noticeability and use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available