4.7 Article

Nano-TiO2 affects Cu speciation, extracellular enzyme activity, and bacterial communities in sediments

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages 77-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.018

Keywords

Sediment; Nano-TiO2; Cu speciation; Bacterial communities; Extracellular enzyme activity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378041, 51290283]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20131102110035]
  3. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2012ZX07501001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In aquatic ecosystems, titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nano-TiO2) coexist with heavy metals and influence the existing forms and toxicities of the metal in water. However, limited information is available regarding the ecological risk of this coexistence in sediments. In this study, the effect of nano-TiO2 on Cu speciation in sediments was investigated using sequential extraction. The microcosm approach was also employed to analyze the effects of the coexistence of nano-TiO2 and Cu on extracellular enzyme activity and bacterial communities in sediments. Results showed that nano-TiO2 decreased the organic matter bound fraction of Cu and increased the corresponding residual fraction Cu. As a result, speciation of exogenous Cu in sediments changed. During the course of the 30-day experiment, the presence of nano TiO2 did not affect Cu-induced changes in bacterial community structure. However, the coexistence of nano-TiO2 and Cu restrained the activity of bacterial extracellular enzymes, such as alkaline phosphatase and beta-glucosidase. The degree of inhibition also varied because of the different properties of extracellular enzymes. This research highlighted the importance of understanding and predicting the effects of the coexistence of nanomaterials and other pollutants in sediments. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available