Journal
CELL AND BIOSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13578-021-00550-3
Keywords
Extracellular vesicles; Isolation method; Ultracentrifugation; Immunoaffinity capturing
Categories
Funding
- Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan [2016TP2002]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Different methods of isolating small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) were compared in this study. Ultracentrifugation was found to be recommended for concentrating sEVs, while immunoaffinity capturing was suitable for studies requiring high purity. Density gradient ultracentrifugation-based method may be applied for obtaining sEVs with controlled size. Proteomic analysis revealed differences in protein contents of sEVs purified by different methods.
Background Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are nanosized vesicles involved in cell-to-cell communication. sEVs have been widely studied for clinical applications such as early detection of diseases and as therapeutics. Various methods for sEVs isolation are been using, but different methods may result in different qualities of sEVs and impact downstream analysis and applications. Here, we compared current isolation methods and performed a comparative analysis of sEVs from supernatant of cultured pancreatic cancer cells. Methods Ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration and co-precipitation as concentration methods were firstly evaluated for yield, size, morphology and protein level of pellets. Then, isolate sEVs obtained by four different purification methods: size exclusion chromatography, density gradient ultracentrifugation, ultracentrifugation, and immunoaffinity capturing, were analysed and compared. Results For the concentration process, ultracentrifugation method obtained high quality and high concentration of pellets. For the purification process, immunoaffinity capturing method obtained the purest sEVs with less contaminants, while density gradient ultracentrifugation-based method obtained sEVs with the smallest size. Proteomic analysis revealed distinct protein contents of purified sEVs from different methods. Conclusions For isolating sEVs derived from supernatant of cultured pancreatic cancer cell line, ultracentrifugation-based method is recommended for concentration of sEVs, density gradient ultracentrifugation-based method may be applied for obtaining purified sEVs with controlled size, immunoaffinity capturing may be suitable for studies requiring sEVs with high purity but may loss subtypes of sEVs without specific protein marker.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available