4.7 Article

Efficacy and safety of new anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies versus rituximab for induction therapy of CD20+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82841-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81700185]
  2. Nursery Talent Training Plan of Third Military Medical University [2017MPRC-01]
  3. Youth Talent Training Plan of Southwest Hospital of Third Military Medical University [SWH2018QNLC-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In comparing new anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies with rituximab in the induction therapy of CD20(+) B-NHL, it was found that obinutuzumab significantly improved PFS but had higher incidence of adverse events, ofatumumab decreased ORR, and Y-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan increased ORR.
Rituximab combined with chemotherapy is the first-line induction therapy of CD20 positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (CD20(+) B-NHL). Recently new anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been developed, but their efficacy and safety compared with rituximab are still controversial. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared new anti-CD20 mAbs with rituximab in induction therapy of B-NHL. The primary outcomes are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), additional outcomes include event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR) and incidences of adverse events (AEs). Time-to-event data were pooled as hazard ratios (HRs) using the generic inverse-variance method and dichotomous outcomes were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method with their respective 95% confidence interval (CI). Eleven RCTs comprising 5261 patients with CD20(+) B-NHL were included. Compared with rituximab, obinutuzumab significantly prolonged PFS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.96, P=0.01), had no improvement on OS, ORR, and CRR, but increased the incidences of serious AEs (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.13-1.48, P<0.001). Ofatumumab was inferior to rituximab in consideration of ORR (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.96, P=0.02), and had no significant differences with rituximab in regard to PFS, OS and CRR. I-131-tositumomab yielded similar PFS, OS, ORR and CRR with rituximab. Y-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan increased ORR (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.47-6.43, P=0.003), but did not improve PFS, DFS, OS and CRR compared with rituximab. In conclusion, compared with rituximab in induction therapy of CD20(+) B-NHL, obinutuzumab significantly improves PFS but with higher incidence of AEs, ofatumumab decreases ORR, Y-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan increases ORR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available