4.7 Article

Addressing limited weight resolution in a fully optical neuromorphic reservoir computing readout

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82720-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [1S32818N]
  2. EU [780848, 688579]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores a new method for boosting the performance of optical weighting elements, even in noisy environments and with very low levels of resolution. The method, utilizing an iterative training process, can select weight connections that are more resistant to quantization and noise, outperforming low-resolution weighting methods by up to several orders of magnitude and providing performance close to full-resolution weighting elements.
Using optical hardware for neuromorphic computing has become more and more popular recently, due to its efficient high-speed data processing capabilities and low power consumption. However, there are still some remaining obstacles to realizing the vision of a completely optical neuromorphic computer. One of them is that, depending on the technology used, optical weighting elements may not share the same resolution as in the electrical domain. Moreover, noise of the weighting elements are important considerations as well. In this article, we investigate a new method for improving the performance of optical weighting components, even in the presence of noise and in the case of very low resolution. Our method utilizes an iterative training procedure and is able to select weight connections that are more robust to quantization and noise. As a result, even with only 8 to 32 levels of resolution, in noisy weighting environments, the method can outperform both nearest rounding low-resolution weighting and random rounding weighting by up to several orders of magnitude in terms of bit error rate and can deliver performance very close to full-resolution weighting elements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available