4.4 Article

Advances in the Management of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Journal

SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 139-149

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722863

Keywords

cancer; venous thromboembolism; anticoagulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The association between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been recognized for over 150 years, presenting a major clinical challenge with significant morbidity and mortality. Specific types of cancer and advanced stage disease can increase the risk of thrombosis. Low-molecular-weight heparin has been commonly used for treatment, but direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as promising alternatives supported by recent trials.
The association between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been established for more than 150 years. Nevertheless, cancer-associated thrombosis still remains a major clinical challenge and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality for patients with cancer. The clinical presentation of cancer-associated thrombosis can be distinct from that of a patient without an underlying malignancy. Moreover, specific cancer types, including pancreatic cancer and hematological malignancies, as well as advanced stage disease can confer a significant thrombotic risk. This risk is further augmented by specific anticancer treatment modalities. The pathophysiology of cancer-associated thrombosis is complex and multifactorial. However, understanding the biological mechanisms underpinning VTE risk may provide insight into novel targeted prophylaxis in cancer patients. Over the last decade, low-molecular-weight heparin has been the preferred anticoagulant agent for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis due to improved efficacy compared with vitamin K antagonists. However, the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has added to the repertoire of ammunition now at the disposal of clinicians to aid in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis. Several randomized controlled trials have now been published, demonstrating DOAC as a noninferior alternative for both the treatment and prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis. Notwithstanding this, limitations for their widespread use remain, with the potential for increased bleeding risk, drug interactions, and poor DOAC metabolism. This review discusses the evidence base for the incidence and risk factors associated with VTE in cancer, development, and refinement of risk prediction models and novel advances in the therapeutic management of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available