4.7 Article

Multiscale digital twin for particle breakage in milling: From nanoindentation to population balance model

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 386, Issue -, Pages 247-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.03.005

Keywords

Multiscale milling; Digital twin; Particle breakage; Nanoindentation; Population balance model; Model validation

Funding

  1. International Fine Particle Research Institute
  2. Innovate UK [158229]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a multiscale modelling approach to integrate information of particle breakage at different scales for quantitative prediction of a milling process. Through nanoindentation and impact pin milling tests, a population balance model is developed to successfully predict the results of different milling operations.
A multiscale modelling approach to integrate resultful information of particle breakage at distinct scales is presented for quantitative prediction of a milling process. The nanoindentation test of zeolite particles is carried out to provide the deterministic value of mechanical properties, prior to which the Hertz based contact theory is described. The impact pin milling test is made to measure the particle size distribution subject to three rotary speeds. The population balance model composed of selection function and breakage function is developed to predict the varying milling operations based on successful model validation. With the hybrid of theoretical, experimental and numerical avenues, a conceptual multiscale modelling roadmap with complementary strength is proposed. The best available information spanning distinct scales is scoped where the interaction of physical twin and digital twin is highlighted. Global system analysis of the key parameters provides projected confidence in milling performance beyond the existing experimental space. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available