4.8 Article

Verifying Random Quantum Circuits with Arbitrary Geometry Using Tensor Network States Algorithm

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 126, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.070502

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of High Performance Computing of China [201901-01]
  2. NSFC [11905294]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The algorithm presented in this study efficiently simulates random quantum circuits using tensor network states, compression techniques, and a heuristic algorithm to compute the optimal tensor contraction path. It is demonstrated to be up to 2 orders of magnitudes faster than the Schrodinger-Feynman algorithm for verifying random quantum circuits on the 53-qubit Sycamore processor. This algorithm is shown to be an ideal tool for verifying relatively shallow quantum circuits on near-term quantum computers.
The ability to efficiently simulate random quantum circuits using a classical computer is increasingly important for developing noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. Here, we present a tensor network states based algorithm specifically designed to compute amplitudes for random quantum circuits with arbitrary geometry. Singular value decomposition based compression together with a two-sided circuit evolution algorithm are used to further compress the resulting tensor network. To further accelerate the simulation, we also propose a heuristic algorithm to compute the optimal tensor contraction path. We demonstrate that our algorithm is up to 2 orders of magnitudes faster than the Schrodinger-Feynman algorithm for verifying random quantum circuits on the 53-qubit Sycamore processor, with circuit depths below 12. We also simulate larger random quantum circuits with up to 104 qubits, showing that this algorithm is an ideal tool to verify relatively shallow quantum circuits on near-term quantum computers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available