4.6 Review

Challenges and Perspectives of Standard Therapy and Drug Development in High-Grade Gliomas

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26041169

Keywords

high-grade glioma; glioblastoma; anaplastic astrocytoma; anaplastic oligodendroglioma; oligodendroglioma; chemotherapy; radiotherapy; immunotherapy; phytochemicals; nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Brain Research Institute Monash Sunway (BRIMS), Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-grade gliomas remain a fatal primary brain tumor, with challenges in standard therapy leading to the need for a multimodal approach that considers environmental and genetic factors affecting treatment response.
Despite their low incidence rate globally, high-grade gliomas (HGG) remain a fatal primary brain tumor. The recommended therapy often is incapable of resecting the tumor entirely and exclusively targeting the tumor leads to tumor recurrence and dismal prognosis. Additionally, many HGG patients are not well suited for standard therapy and instead, subjected to a palliative approach. HGG tumors are highly infiltrative and the complex tumor microenvironment as well as high tumor heterogeneity often poses the main challenges towards the standard treatment. Therefore, a one-fit-approach may not be suitable for HGG management. Thus, a multimodal approach of standard therapy with immunotherapy, nanomedicine, repurposing of older drugs, use of phytochemicals, and precision medicine may be more advantageous than a single treatment model. This multimodal approach considers the environmental and genetic factors which could affect the patient's response to therapy, thus improving their outcome. This review discusses the current views and advances in potential HGG therapeutic approaches and, aims to bridge the existing knowledge gap that will assist in overcoming challenges in HGG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available