4.7 Article

Preparation of hierarchical SSZ-13 by NH4F etching

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 314, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110863

Keywords

Zeolite; Hierarchical; Fluoride etching; SSZ-13

Funding

  1. Normandy region [RIN 100]
  2. Industrial Chair ANRTOTAL Nano Clean Energy [ANR-17-CHIN-0005-01]
  3. FEDER [18P01675]
  4. Carnot Institute (Energie et Systeme de Propulsion), the 3DNanoZET project
  5. Region Haute-Normandie
  6. Metropole Rouen Normandie
  7. CNRS via LABEX EMC
  8. French National Research Agency as a part of the program Investissements d'avenir [ANR-11-EQPX0020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NH4-SSZ-13 zeolite is etched using an aqueous solution of 40% NH4F under different time/temperature conditions to obtain hierarchical derivatives. The zeolites exhibit sensitivity to high temperature and high liquid-solid ratio treatments, which can lead to significant crystallinity losses. Careful tuning of these parameters is necessary to retain important characteristics in the hierarchical derivatives. The catalytic activity of the modified SSZ-13 is evaluated in n-propanol conversion.
NH4-SSZ-13 is etched with an aqueous solution of 40 w/% NH4F under different time/temperature conditions to obtain hierarchical derivatives. The etched zeolites are characterized by XRD, SEM, N-2 physisorption, Si-29/Al-27/F-19 MAS NMR, ICP-AES, and their acidity monitored by in situ FTIR spectroscopy using acetonitrile as a probe molecule. The results highlight that the zeolite is very sensitive to high temperature and high liquid-solid ratio treatments leading to substantial crystallinity losses. These two parameters need careful tuning to obtain hierarchical derivatives retaining important characteristics as micropore volume and framework Si/Al ratio. The catalytic activity of the modified SSZ-13 is evaluated in the n-propanol conversion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available