4.7 Article

The impact of the North American shale gas revolution on regional natural gas markets: Evidence from the regime-switching model

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 167-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.047

Keywords

Shale gas revolution; Natural gas market; Regime-switching model; Price spreads

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91546109, 71203210, 71133005, 71503274]
  2. scientific research foundation of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law [31541410517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the impact of the North American shale gas revolution on price movement regimes in the North American and European gas markets, using the Markov regime-switching model. It then measures price spreads between oil and gas from 1998 to 2015 to identify the impact of the revolution on the relationship between oil and regional gas prices. The results show that the typical movement regime of Henry Hub prices changes from 'slightly upward' to 'sharply downward'. In addition, the clear seasonal effect of Henry Hub prices has disappeared after the shale gas revolution. The typical movement of national balancing point (NBP) prices has changed gradually from a 'sharply upward' regime to the alternative regimes between 'sharply downward' and 'slightly upward', tending to follow oil prices. This indicates that the shale gas revolution has had little impact on NBP price movement. Meanwhile, Henry Hub prices have decoupled from WTI prices, while NBP and Brent prices have continued to exhibit a long-term equilibrium level around which they have swung in the short time frame since the shale gas revolution. Pertinent energy policy makers and energy market participants should pay attention to these changes and adjust their trade, production and investment strategies accordingly. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available