4.6 Article

Random Structure Searching with Orbital-Free Density Functional Theory

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 125, Issue 7, Pages 1650-1660

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c11030

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Molecular Sciences Software Institute
  2. Schmidt Science
  3. Rhodes Trust
  4. EPSRC [EP/P020259/1, EP/S021981/1, EP/P022596/1]
  5. EPSRC CDT in Computational Methods for Materials Science [EP/L015552/1]
  6. STFC
  7. EPSRC [EP/P020259/1, EP/P022596/1, EP/S021981/1, 1948654] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using orbital-free density functional theory for structure searching, low-energy crystal structures of Li, Na, Mg, and Al at zero pressure were successfully mapped, identifying different ground state and low-energy structures.
The properties of a material depend on how its atoms are arranged, and predicting these arrangements from first principles is a longstanding challenge. Orbital-free density functional theory provides a quantum-mechanical model based solely on the electron density, not individual wave functions. The resulting speedups make it attractive for random structure searching, whereby random configurations of atoms are relaxed to local minima in the energy landscape. We use this strategy to map the low-energy crystal structures of Li, Na, Mg, and Al at zero pressure. For Li and Na, our searching finds numerous close-packed polytypes of almost-equal energy, consistent with previous efforts to understand their low-temperature forms. For Mg and Al, the searching identifies the expected ground state structures unambiguously, in addition to revealing other low-energy structures. This new role for orbital-free density functional theory particularly as continued advances make it accurate for more of the periodic table-will expedite crystal structure prediction over wide ranges of compositions and pressures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available